Should A Lawyer Join One Of Those Business Networking Groups?

Lots of lawyers come to me asking if those referral groups were worth their time. I checked out one called LeTip a number of years ago and wasn’t really impressed with the opportunities. It felt too forced for my liking, and I’m not really into the glad-handing that goes on.

There’s a similar group called BNI. This group apparently forces group members to refer business to one another. In thinking about it, the scheme doesn’t sound like it’s really fit for lawyers. My suspicions were confirmed by reading an from Oregon (OSB Formal Ethics Op. No. 2004-175 concerning “Lawyer Membership in Business Referral Clubs”). The issue seems to be the mandatory referrals to group members.

“The question posed to the legal ethics committee was whether Lawyer A may participate in the activities of the association, and the committee concluded that the lawyer could not do so. The ethics committee found that participation in the association would violate DR 2-103(A) which prohibits a lawyer from compensating or giving anything of value to a person or organization to promote, recommend or secure employment by a client or as a reward for having made a recommendation resulting in employment by a client. The committee also concluded that participation in the association would violate DR 2-105 which prevents a lawyer from referring a client to a nonlawyer with the understanding that the lawyer will receive a fee, commission or anything of value in exchange for the referral.”

Read the entire formal ethics opinion. As far as I’m concerned, I think I’d leave these organizations to other professions.

Technorati Tags: , letip, ,

Mac vs. PC: Lets really get started!!

Mac vs PC Scales.jpegBen Cowgill attempted to fire the first shot with his post, PC vs. Mac: Let’s get started. He mentions that we should start by stating the “core values” of our positions. And his core value is functionality. Ben, Ben, Ben, you don’t back it up with how a peecee is more functional than a Mac. So, let me really get this started.

Interesting point, functionality and a peecee, windoze box. I have to question such a statement coming from a peecee when getting lock ups and the blue screen of death is measured in weeks, days and even hours in some cases. You want to talk functionality, lets really talk functionality. I have had a Mac in my office now for over two years. I have yet had the pleasure of seeing a blue screen of death. In fact, I have yet had a lock up of the machine. Don’t get me wrong. There are program lock ups. But, it does not lock up the entire machine to the point you have to restart the computer. All a Mac user has to do is quit that program and restart the program. Thats it, nothing else. And, at least in my case, the only program that does lock up on my Mac is Microsoft Office: Mac. Now that is funny windoze users.

What about compatibility? Got you covered. On those occasions when I have to run a windoze program, I simple start up Parallels, XP and run the program on my Mac. What is even more amazing than that, XP runs faster on my MacBook than it does on my son’s gaming peecee. In addition, speaking of compatibility, I can open, edit, save and exchange any word document you want to throw at me. After all, I do have Word for Mac on my Mac. Compatibility, got you covered Ben.

We have to consider downtime next. When I was using a peecee network in my law office, I was attacked by a virus that knocked me out for 3 days. And, I had to spend hard earned money paying an IT person to come in a fix it. Lets see, downtime and an expense I don’t now have with a Mac driven law office. In fact, I don’t even worry about virus, worms or those nasty trojan horses thrown at you peecee users. I don’t worry about updating Norton’s Anti Virus or McAfee’s Anti Virus. No Zone Alarm here either. Downtime, what downtime?

So, Ben, you want to talk functionality. There is no comparison between a Mac and a peecee when you talk functionality. And my “core value” is this. A Mac “just works”, and works all the time.

Ben, tell me something you can do on your peecee you think I can’t do on my Mac.

UPDATE: Here is Ben’s response to this post. OK, I will bite. I will address the software question in my next post.

Why Offering A Job To A Second-Grader May Not Be A Great Idea

Roger Parloff from CNN has this article about a rejection letter sent by a second-grader to a law firm in response to an offer of a job interview.

Blogs Integrated into a Website?

One comment and question I have seen come up a lot lately is, should a blog be integrated into a website? While I have no problem with putting a link on your website to your blog and vice versa. I do have a problem with actually integrating your blog into your website. I actually discussed this with Kevin O’Keefe of LexBlog today. Kevin is one of the most knowledgeable individuals I know when it comes to blogging. What follows is a summary of that conversation.

A blog is akin to an educational magazine. If you are updating your blog with new content, as you should be, you are publishing new issues of your “magazine” every time you do. You are providing free information to the public in a form and method people can use and understand. It is not the same type of promotional tool as a website. You are providing updated information on a blog often. You update it daily, weekly or monthly. And a blog is meant to be cited, people don’t cite a website. The big advantage of a blog over a static website is just that, it gets cited. Not just from lawyers, but lot’s of other bloggers. If you put your blog inside the website, those cites to your blog will not happen. You will not get the same SEO either. Cites and links are what drive traffic to your blog and in turn drive you business.

[Read more...]

Sololawyer — You aren’t alone…

Richard M. “Rick” Georges of the Futurelawyer has started a new blog called, SoloLawyer.

I am honored that he has asked me to guest post from time to time on this great new addition to the list of blogs available to solos.

I don't have the time and there is too much competition. Blah, blah, blah.

Comments about blogging that drive me crazy.

“A blog in Kansas will do better than a blog in a major market.“ I have a hard time believing my blog in Kansas, with a population of 2.7 million would do better than a blog in a major market. I also have never said you should post as much as I did or do. And I don’t have any more time than any one else. I have been able to find the time to do it. And yes, I don’t like Blogger. I firmly believe there are better alternatives out there for a blogging platform. Oh, “and there are other niche blogs in my market, so why would I do one?“ “And I don’t waste my time doing links.“

I use a MacBook. I take it everywhere. And when I am waiting for court or for other things, I find a wifi and post if I have not done so recently. And I use a Treo. And I have been known to sit in a courtroom waiting on a hearing and posting to my blog. I also post early in the morning or late at night. If you want to find the time, you will find it.

A niche blog is the way to go. Even if you have a practice that does more than one area of law, don’t combine your practice areas into one blog. Do one for each practice area. I do one for family law, criminal law, and one on grandparent visitation and parent’s rights. Your readers will like it better and so will your search results.

[Read more...]

Kansas Family Law Blogger Gets PR

I was mentioned in the March Issue of Smart Money in an article called 10 Things Your Blogger Won’t Tell You.

The article was not what I expected, but it at least gets legal bloggers noticed by the public as providing information.

And, there will be more about the Home Office Lawyer coming out in March. But, you will have to wait until the article is published. I don’t want to steal the thunder for the publication.

Marketing Your Practice Online Can Be A Lot Easier

What would you, a consumer bankruptcy lawyer, do if there were a way for you to spend five bucks, write a few ads and immediately reach millions of people?  And what if that system could not only make you a ton of money, but also let you test ads to see which one worked best?

Well, Google does just that and a whole lot more.  Google has a system that makes it possible, for the first time in the history of the world, to instantly get access to over 100 million people – in less than 10 minutes.  And all for less money than you’re spending on a day’s worth of a Yellow Pages ad or television spot.

It’s called Google AdWords and it’s incredible.  In fact it may be the first and best thing to do to get qualified traffic to your site.

But it’s not always as easy as I just made it sound – AdWords has some nuances, and most people have a rough time at first.  In fact, when I started using AdWords I was spending almost a thousand dollars a week and getting nothing for it.

Maybe you use it already, maybe not.  If you do, you definitely know what I’m talking about.  It seems so easy, so absolutely simple, to toss up an ad.  Google sells it as the easiest thing since sliced bread, right?  But then the charges roll in and you realize you’re spending thousands of dollars a month and not really getting all that much in return.

I discovered Perry Marshall, the Google AdWords guru.  He has written a very helpful e-course called “5 days to success with Google AdWords” and there’s no charge for it.

You can find out about it by clicking here.

Perry’s the smartest AdWords marketing guy out there, and the fact that this course is free just blows me away.  I did it about a year ago and now I’m spending less money than ever and getting better results with AdWords than I ever thought possible.

So go sign up for the course.  Let me know what you think.

And by the way, the link you click will have an affiliate code on it. Perry has agreed to let me know if any of my readers sign up for the course, which will help me to figure out how helpful this program is for consumer bankruptcy lawyers.