http://www.legalpracticepro.com/guest-posting-the-dark-side/ Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:59:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.legalpracticepro.com/guest-posting-the-dark-side/comment-page-1/#comment-2141 JayFleischman Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:45:05 +0000 http://www.legalpracticepro.com/?p=1826#comment-2141 The "Legal Communications" person mistakenly sent an internal email meant for the attorney to me, an outsider.As to, "I am quoted with a link to one of my sites, but it is not my post," I meant that the lawyer to whom I submitted to guest post took the idea, changed the wording, and did not use the post. Rather, he quoted me in a single line (giving me the backlink and credit) but otherwise did not use the post. The "Legal Communications" person mistakenly sent an internal email meant for the attorney to me, an outsider.As to, "I am quoted with a link to one of my sites, but it is not my post," I meant that the lawyer to whom I submitted to guest post took the idea, changed the wording, and did not use the post. Rather, he quoted me in a single line (giving me the backlink and credit) but otherwise did not use the post.

]]> http://www.legalpracticepro.com/guest-posting-the-dark-side/comment-page-1/#comment-901 JayFleischman Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:45:05 +0000 http://www.legalpracticepro.com/?p=1826#comment-901 The "Legal Communications" person mistakenly sent an internal email meant for the attorney to me, an outsider.As to, "I am quoted with a link to one of my sites, but it is not my post," I meant that the lawyer to whom I submitted to guest post took the idea, changed the wording, and did not use the post. Rather, he quoted me in a single line (giving me the backlink and credit) but otherwise did not use the post. The "Legal Communications" person mistakenly sent an internal email meant for the attorney to me, an outsider.As to, "I am quoted with a link to one of my sites, but it is not my post," I meant that the lawyer to whom I submitted to guest post took the idea, changed the wording, and did not use the post. Rather, he quoted me in a single line (giving me the backlink and credit) but otherwise did not use the post.

]]> http://www.legalpracticepro.com/guest-posting-the-dark-side/comment-page-1/#comment-895 Thorne Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:51:51 +0000 http://www.legalpracticepro.com/?p=1826#comment-895 I just can't follow this. You lost me at the point where you said the "Legal Communications" person didn't understand reply all. I don't know what that means.Maybe I need another cup of coffee, or perhaps others are just as lost.RE: "I am quoted with a link to one of my sites, but it is not my post."Huh?PS: and what's with the "either you have a certain type of account or you can't comment here" option? :Thorne<a href="mailto:mister.thorne@comcast.net" rel="nofollow">mister.thorne@comcast.net</a>http://misterthorne.org I just can't follow this. You lost me at the point where you said the "Legal Communications" person didn't understand reply all. I don't know what that means.Maybe I need another cup of coffee, or perhaps others are just as lost.RE: "I am quoted with a link to one of my sites, but it is not my post."Huh?PS: and what's with the "either you have a certain type of account or you can't comment here" option? :Thornemister.thorne@comcast.nethttp://misterthorne.org

]]> http://www.legalpracticepro.com/guest-posting-the-dark-side/comment-page-1/#comment-885 Surprise Party Planning | Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:29:51 +0000 http://www.legalpracticepro.com/?p=1826#comment-885 [...] Legal Marketing And Guest Posting – The Dark Side [...] [...] Legal Marketing And Guest Posting – The Dark Side [...]

]]>