<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rocket Matter Sounds Great But &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.legalpracticepro.com/rocketmatter-sounds-great-but/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.legalpracticepro.com/rocketmatter-sounds-great-but/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:59:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bengains</title>
		<link>http://www.legalpracticepro.com/rocketmatter-sounds-great-but/comment-page-1/#comment-1760</link>
		<dc:creator>bengains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homeofficeenvy.com/web-tools/rocketmatter-sounds-great-but/#comment-1760</guid>
		<description>I have tried them all. Houdini Esq is the best solution. I rank them according to features.1. Houdini Esq2. Advologix3. Clio4. RocketMatterthen rest don&#039;t deserve a mention in my book. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried them all. Houdini Esq is the best solution. I rank them according to features.1. Houdini Esq2. Advologix3. Clio4. RocketMatterthen rest don&#039;t deserve a mention in my book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn M. Myricxk</title>
		<link>http://www.legalpracticepro.com/rocketmatter-sounds-great-but/comment-page-1/#comment-1759</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn M. Myricxk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homeofficeenvy.com/web-tools/rocketmatter-sounds-great-but/#comment-1759</guid>
		<description>I am going to switch from TM 9 to Rocket Matter.  I have used TM for 7 years. TM&#039;s release 10 will not work on a Novel Linux server - so I figured they have put me out of their customer base.  I evaluated HoudiniEsq and I didn&#039;t think it was quite ready although it is a great product.  The one feature in RM that is missing is the email integration - I don&#039;t understand why that is since so much information in our cases is passed on by email.  We should be able to park our emails in their directory with one click of the mouse.  But, they have not provided information as the when that will be part of RM.  It is integrated in HoudiniEsq.Lynn </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going to switch from TM 9 to Rocket Matter.  I have used TM for 7 years. TM&#039;s release 10 will not work on a Novel Linux server &#8211; so I figured they have put me out of their customer base.  I evaluated HoudiniEsq and I didn&#039;t think it was quite ready although it is a great product.  The one feature in RM that is missing is the email integration &#8211; I don&#039;t understand why that is since so much information in our cases is passed on by email.  We should be able to park our emails in their directory with one click of the mouse.  But, they have not provided information as the when that will be part of RM.  It is integrated in HoudiniEsq.Lynn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn M. Myricxk</title>
		<link>http://www.legalpracticepro.com/rocketmatter-sounds-great-but/comment-page-1/#comment-1758</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn M. Myricxk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homeofficeenvy.com/web-tools/rocketmatter-sounds-great-but/#comment-1758</guid>
		<description>I am going to switch from TM 9 to Rocket Matter.  I have used TM for 7 years. TM&#039;s release 10 will not work on a Novel Linux server - so I figured they have put me out of their customer base.  I evaluated HoudiniEsq and I didn&#039;t think it was quite ready although it is a great product.  The one feature in RM that is missing is the email integration - I don&#039;t understand why that is since so much information in our cases is passed on by email.  We should be able to park our emails in their directory with one click of the mouse.  But, they have not provided information as the when that will be part of RM.  It is integrated in HoudiniEsq.Lynn </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going to switch from TM 9 to Rocket Matter.  I have used TM for 7 years. TM&#039;s release 10 will not work on a Novel Linux server &#8211; so I figured they have put me out of their customer base.  I evaluated HoudiniEsq and I didn&#039;t think it was quite ready although it is a great product.  The one feature in RM that is missing is the email integration &#8211; I don&#039;t understand why that is since so much information in our cases is passed on by email.  We should be able to park our emails in their directory with one click of the mouse.  But, they have not provided information as the when that will be part of RM.  It is integrated in HoudiniEsq.Lynn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocket Matter online practice management software is promising, but seriously expensive &#124; Lawyerist</title>
		<link>http://www.legalpracticepro.com/rocketmatter-sounds-great-but/comment-page-1/#comment-1757</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocket Matter online practice management software is promising, but seriously expensive &#124; Lawyerist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 21:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homeofficeenvy.com/web-tools/rocketmatter-sounds-great-but/#comment-1757</guid>
		<description>[...] Just spotted a post by Larry Port from Rocket Matter on the HomeOfficeEnvy blog. Apparently Rocket Matter has some features they don&#8217;t talk about on their site (why in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just spotted a post by Larry Port from Rocket Matter on the HomeOfficeEnvy blog. Apparently Rocket Matter has some features they don&#8217;t talk about on their site (why in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Long</title>
		<link>http://www.legalpracticepro.com/rocketmatter-sounds-great-but/comment-page-1/#comment-1754</link>
		<dc:creator>Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homeofficeenvy.com/web-tools/rocketmatter-sounds-great-but/#comment-1754</guid>
		<description>@Brian 
 
I haven&#039;t done it.  But before LN renamed all of these software items (back when it was just PCLaw and TimeMatters) I know it was easily accomplished.  There&#039;s a PCLAW listserv group that might be helpful - I&#039;m sure there&#039;s a few consultants on there in addition to attorneys wondering how to perform certain functions. 
 
I dont want the group to get spammed so if you want the link, email me here:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://homeofficeenvy.com/contact-me/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://homeofficeenvy.com/contact-me/&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brian </p>
<p>I haven&#039;t done it.  But before LN renamed all of these software items (back when it was just PCLaw and TimeMatters) I know it was easily accomplished.  There&#039;s a PCLAW listserv group that might be helpful &#8211; I&#039;m sure there&#039;s a few consultants on there in addition to attorneys wondering how to perform certain functions. </p>
<p>I dont want the group to get spammed so if you want the link, email me here:  <a href="http://homeofficeenvy.com/contact-me/">http://homeofficeenvy.com/contact-me/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Hebert</title>
		<link>http://www.legalpracticepro.com/rocketmatter-sounds-great-but/comment-page-1/#comment-1753</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Hebert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 07:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homeofficeenvy.com/web-tools/rocketmatter-sounds-great-but/#comment-1753</guid>
		<description>I am interested in other&#039;s experiences in syncing Lexis Nexis Front Offica and Back Office and locating an IT professional with experience at integrating the two. I&#039;ve used PC Law for years in my 3 lawyer lawfirm and puchased Front Office a year ago. We still seem to be having trouble with the integration of the two. We have some lawyers using Front Office and others using Back Office/Outlook for time keeping and email. Any suggestions. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am interested in other&#039;s experiences in syncing Lexis Nexis Front Offica and Back Office and locating an IT professional with experience at integrating the two. I&#039;ve used PC Law for years in my 3 lawyer lawfirm and puchased Front Office a year ago. We still seem to be having trouble with the integration of the two. We have some lawyers using Front Office and others using Back Office/Outlook for time keeping and email. Any suggestions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://www.legalpracticepro.com/rocketmatter-sounds-great-but/comment-page-1/#comment-1755</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homeofficeenvy.com/web-tools/rocketmatter-sounds-great-but/#comment-1755</guid>
		<description>Has anyone tried Clio yet?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.goclio.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.goclio.com&lt;/a&gt;. 
 
It was just launched - it&#039;s got a prettier interface than RocketMatter (IMHO), but more importantly, it has more billing and matter management features (such as timers you can run) AND it has integrated document management, with versions and unlimited storage.  Plus, it&#039;s cheaper than RocketMatter at $50/user/month (as compared to RocketMatter&#039;s $75).  I&#039;m about to branch out on my own and I am definitely attracted to the idea of SaaS for my practice management - I&#039;d be interested to here about people&#039;s experiences with Clio, since it seems like the most attractive option to me right now. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone tried Clio yet?  <a href="http://www.goclio.com">http://www.goclio.com</a>. </p>
<p>It was just launched &#8211; it&#039;s got a prettier interface than RocketMatter (IMHO), but more importantly, it has more billing and matter management features (such as timers you can run) AND it has integrated document management, with versions and unlimited storage.  Plus, it&#039;s cheaper than RocketMatter at $50/user/month (as compared to RocketMatter&#039;s $75).  I&#039;m about to branch out on my own and I am definitely attracted to the idea of SaaS for my practice management &#8211; I&#039;d be interested to here about people&#039;s experiences with Clio, since it seems like the most attractive option to me right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Long</title>
		<link>http://www.legalpracticepro.com/rocketmatter-sounds-great-but/comment-page-1/#comment-1752</link>
		<dc:creator>Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homeofficeenvy.com/web-tools/rocketmatter-sounds-great-but/#comment-1752</guid>
		<description>@Donna: 
 
My name is Long, not Larry...and I don&#039;t own Rocketmatter, I was just reviewing it.  You might want to address further questions on the RocketMatter blog. 
 
Thanks! 
Long </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Donna: </p>
<p>My name is Long, not Larry&#8230;and I don&#039;t own Rocketmatter, I was just reviewing it.  You might want to address further questions on the RocketMatter blog. </p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
Long</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

