<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Get Taken By &#8220;Bankruptcy Practice Marketing Experts&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.legalpracticepro.com/taken-by-bankruptcy-practice-marketing-experts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.legalpracticepro.com/taken-by-bankruptcy-practice-marketing-experts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:59:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JayFleischman</title>
		<link>http://www.legalpracticepro.com/taken-by-bankruptcy-practice-marketing-experts/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>JayFleischman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalpracticepro.com/?p=1604#comment-633</guid>
		<description>Excellent point, Michael!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point, Michael!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JayFleischman</title>
		<link>http://www.legalpracticepro.com/taken-by-bankruptcy-practice-marketing-experts/comment-page-1/#comment-617</link>
		<dc:creator>JayFleischman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 03:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalpracticepro.com/?p=1604#comment-617</guid>
		<description>Excellent point, Michael!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point, Michael!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Marr</title>
		<link>http://www.legalpracticepro.com/taken-by-bankruptcy-practice-marketing-experts/comment-page-1/#comment-602</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Marr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 19:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalpracticepro.com/?p=1604#comment-602</guid>
		<description>I learned all I needed to know about marketing pre-internet days when a new lawyer bought the back cover of a phone book advertising his skills and I was telling him how to fix his objectionable Chapter 13 plans by looking over them for 30 seconds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I learned all I needed to know about marketing pre-internet days when a new lawyer bought the back cover of a phone book advertising his skills and I was telling him how to fix his objectionable Chapter 13 plans by looking over them for 30 seconds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie A. Fleming</title>
		<link>http://www.legalpracticepro.com/taken-by-bankruptcy-practice-marketing-experts/comment-page-1/#comment-572</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie A. Fleming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalpracticepro.com/?p=1604#comment-572</guid>
		<description>This is disturbing.  The internet makes it so much easier to pretend to be someone that you&#039;re not--to claim more experience, more schooling, more success rates--and it&#039;s difficult for anyone to question it. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because there are so few ways to verify these claims, consumers often need to decide between trusting everyone and trusting no one. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would recommend taking three steps before hiring anyone found online:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Google them.  Even through there&#039;s no way to guarantee that all or even any of the information found in a google search is accurate--after all, the same person who made up qualifications could have easily gone to several review sites and written praise under a variety of aliases--it&#039;s a good start, and you may find valuable information about them from trustworthy sources. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. Call them.  A faker may be able to make himself sound great in writing, but not be able keep up ruse in real time.  A phone call will allow you to test how knowledgeable they sound. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3. Get the phone number of at least one former client you can call for a recommendation. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even with all of these steps, there&#039;s no guarantee that a clever conman won&#039;t be able to fool you, but most of the fakers online aren&#039;t so clever and prepared--they&#039;re just trying to make themselves sound more experienced than they are, and this attempt will fall apart under too much scrutinizing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is disturbing.  The internet makes it so much easier to pretend to be someone that you&#39;re not&#8211;to claim more experience, more schooling, more success rates&#8211;and it&#39;s difficult for anyone to question it. </p>
<p>Because there are so few ways to verify these claims, consumers often need to decide between trusting everyone and trusting no one. </p>
<p>I would recommend taking three steps before hiring anyone found online:</p>
<p>1. Google them.  Even through there&#39;s no way to guarantee that all or even any of the information found in a google search is accurate&#8211;after all, the same person who made up qualifications could have easily gone to several review sites and written praise under a variety of aliases&#8211;it&#39;s a good start, and you may find valuable information about them from trustworthy sources. </p>
<p>2. Call them.  A faker may be able to make himself sound great in writing, but not be able keep up ruse in real time.  A phone call will allow you to test how knowledgeable they sound. </p>
<p>3. Get the phone number of at least one former client you can call for a recommendation. </p>
<p>Even with all of these steps, there&#39;s no guarantee that a clever conman won&#39;t be able to fool you, but most of the fakers online aren&#39;t so clever and prepared&#8211;they&#39;re just trying to make themselves sound more experienced than they are, and this attempt will fall apart under too much scrutinizing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

