<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Are Lawyers Really Marketing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.legalpracticepro.com/what-are-lawyers-really-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.legalpracticepro.com/what-are-lawyers-really-marketing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:59:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Fleischman</title>
		<link>http://www.legalpracticepro.com/what-are-lawyers-really-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Fleischman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 04:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalpracticepro.com/?p=113#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Exactly, Bob.  Then knowledge is important to provide the prospect or client with peace of mind that you know what you&#039;re doing, and are trustworthy.  But even if they know HOW to do it, doesn&#039;t mean they WILL undertake it on their own.  And if they do, power to them - it releases good will into the world.  You would not have gotten that person as a client anyway, they would have gone pro se.  This way, at least they&#039;ve got a fighting chance of getting it right. 
 
Scott, this goes for your problem as well.  You need to factor the loss into your calculations.  You won&#039;t get every client, and at least someone will take advantage of your largesse.  But so long as more people respect your information than not, you come out ahead. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, Bob.  Then knowledge is important to provide the prospect or client with peace of mind that you know what you&#039;re doing, and are trustworthy.  But even if they know HOW to do it, doesn&#039;t mean they WILL undertake it on their own.  And if they do, power to them &#8211; it releases good will into the world.  You would not have gotten that person as a client anyway, they would have gone pro se.  This way, at least they&#039;ve got a fighting chance of getting it right. </p>
<p>Scott, this goes for your problem as well.  You need to factor the loss into your calculations.  You won&#039;t get every client, and at least someone will take advantage of your largesse.  But so long as more people respect your information than not, you come out ahead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Robert Harlan</title>
		<link>http://www.legalpracticepro.com/what-are-lawyers-really-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-2876</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Robert Harlan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalpracticepro.com/?p=113#comment-2876</guid>
		<description>Jay,  I like the comparison to other service based businesses to get marketing ideas that work and to avoid mistakes others have made.  I have not found a problem with clients taking my intake work to another attorney.  It may have happened and I just never knew it.  The idea of providing more information to the potential client pays off with a more informed client that can help me represent them. The payoff for the client is more comfort with the process, therefore a more certain result.  The payoff for me is less hand holding is required and the client will be better able to provide the necessary information with fewer interactions with staff.  I resist the idea that our services can be packaged to compare from firm to firm since the level of service and competence ranges so greatly.  Perhaps 70% of the cases are routine but the other 30% are not and clients can never be sure their case is one of the 70%.  The problem with general information is that its just general and clients may be lulled into a false complacency by thinking they have learned all there is to know about the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay,  I like the comparison to other service based businesses to get marketing ideas that work and to avoid mistakes others have made.  I have not found a problem with clients taking my intake work to another attorney.  It may have happened and I just never knew it.  The idea of providing more information to the potential client pays off with a more informed client that can help me represent them. The payoff for the client is more comfort with the process, therefore a more certain result.  The payoff for me is less hand holding is required and the client will be better able to provide the necessary information with fewer interactions with staff.  I resist the idea that our services can be packaged to compare from firm to firm since the level of service and competence ranges so greatly.  Perhaps 70% of the cases are routine but the other 30% are not and clients can never be sure their case is one of the 70%.  The problem with general information is that its just general and clients may be lulled into a false complacency by thinking they have learned all there is to know about the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Nielson</title>
		<link>http://www.legalpracticepro.com/what-are-lawyers-really-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Nielson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalpracticepro.com/?p=113#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Jay:  I like your theory - it&#039;s related to what I&#039;ve done for years with clients and potential clients.  However, I&#039;ve also seen what always ticks me off in this area - when I provide lots of information to a potential client and then that person takes the information to another lawyer. 
 
What are your thoughts on that? 
 
Regards, 
Scott </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay:  I like your theory &#8211; it&#039;s related to what I&#039;ve done for years with clients and potential clients.  However, I&#039;ve also seen what always ticks me off in this area &#8211; when I provide lots of information to a potential client and then that person takes the information to another lawyer.</p>
<p>What are your thoughts on that?</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

